【作者简介】李适源，北京大学光华管理学院社会研究中心博士候选人，主要研究方向为主观态度与社会分层、教育与青少年发展。

【文章来源】《社会学评论》2024年第2期

【内容提要】本研究关注我国市场化改革晚近阶段从国有部门（体制内）转向市场部门（体制外）工作的跨体制流动，考察了跨体制流动经历对劳动者主观福祉的因果作用及其中介机制。基于三期中国家庭追踪调查数据（CFPS2014、2016、2018），本研究采用纵向设计思路，将“核匹配”与回归分析相结合，主要发现为：其一，跨体制流动呈现出负向选择模式，体制内处于相对劣势的劳动者更可能经历跨体制流动；其二，经历跨体制流动（从国有部门流出到市场部门）对劳动者的主观福祉产生了幅度较大并且统计显著的负面影响；其三，针对“主观福祉之失”，以社会保险和住房补贴为代表的经济机制、以人际关系和主观地位为代表的社会心理机制，均发挥了显著的中介效应。本研究有助于为当下国家机构改革提供政策参考。

【关键词】主观福祉 / 跨体制流动 / 社会心理机制

【全文链接】http://src.ruc.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V12/I2/219

The Loss of Subjective Wellbeing and State-to-Private Mobility: New Evidence from a Longitudinal Study

LI Shiyuan

Abstract：This study focuses on state-to-private mobility during the later stage of market reform in China, with a causal analysis of such mobility on workers’ subjective wellbeing and its underlying mechanisms. Using a longitudinal design based on data from the China Family Panel Studies（CFPS 2014, 2016, and 2018）,This study carries out post-matching regression controlling for a rich set of premobility covariates to mitigate the selection bias. The main findings are as follows:first, state-to-private mobility exhibits a distinct negative selection pattern, in which relatively disadvantaged workers in the public sector are more likely to move toward the private sector. Second, the state-to-private mobility experience has a substantive and statistically significant detrimental impact on workers’subjective wellbeing.Third, economic factors, represented by social insurance and housing allowance, and psychosocial factors, represented by interpersonal relationships and subjective status,have mediated the causal effect of state-to-private mobility on workers’subjective wellbeing. This paper provides meaningful policy references for current national institutional reforms.

Keywords: subjective wellbeing, state-to-private mobility, psychosocial mechanisms